Table 1. Effect of fixative protocols on detection of prey DNA, quantity of prey DNA detected (in egg equivalent) and total DNA in sample (including predator and prey). Prey is a single CPB egg, fed to C. maculata larva, fixed immediately after cessation of feeding.
trt.no. Treatment n % detect egg equivalent se total DNAb (pred+prey) se
1 Egg positive control (frozen in EtOH) 10 100% 1.0000 ± 0.1233 1.72 ± 0.14
2 Freeze EtOH 9 (11)a 100% 0.2284 ± 0.0571 21.63 ± 1.81
3 Freeze −80°C 11 (12) 100% 0.0604 ± 0.0207 21.03 ± 2.08
4 Freeze −20°C 10 90% 0.0279 ± 0.0051 17.44 ± 1.64
5 Room temp EtOH 10 80% 0.0078 ± 0.0015 16.08 ± 1.55
6 Antifreeze 10 90% 0.0071 ± 0.0013 6.43 ± 3.61
7 CO2, 4h 9 22% 0.0012 ± 0.0009 19.08 ± 1.41
8 CO2, 5d 10 0% 0 ± 0 9.73 ± 1.60
9 Unfed control (frozen in EtOH) 10 0% 0 ± 0 16.04 ± 1.58
TEST (trt. no compared) % detectc egg equivalentd total DNAd
Overall significance of treatment (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) p<0.0001 (χ2(6)=46.80) p<0.0001(H(6)=51.63) p<0.0001 (H(6)=39.02)
Orthogonal contrasts:
Contrast: frozen (2, 3, 4) vs. warm (5, 6, 7, 8) p<0.0001 (n=70) p<0.0001 (U’=1129.5) p<0.0001 (U’=1024.5)
Contrast within frozen: solvent (2) vs. dry (3, 4) ns p=0.0058 (U’=155.5) ns
Contrast within warm: solvent (5, 6) vs. dry (7, 8) p<0.0001 (n=40) p<0.0001 (U’=331) ns
Contrast within frozen dry: −80°C (3) vs. −20°C (4) ns ns ns
Contrast within warm solvent: EtOH (5) vs. Antifreeze (6) ns ns p=0.0005 (U’=96)
Contrast within warm dry (CO2): 4h (7) vs. 5d (8) ns ns p=0.0015 (U’=84)
Contrasts with controls:
Contrast within frozen solvent: fed (2) vs. egg control (1) ns p=0.0003 (U’=89) ---
Contrast within frozen solvent: fed (2) vs. unfed control (9) --- --- p=0.0166 (U’=89)
Contrast warm dry (7, 8) vs. unfed control (9) ns ns ns