The Journal of Insect Science: Volume 5/Article 14/Table 5

Table 5. Control of codling moth with various neonicotinyl insecticides in replicated field trials, 1999-2004.

Insecticide	Rate (g AI/ha)	Hort. Mineral oil rate (vol:vol)	Year	Location / block no. ^a	Application method and liters/ha ^b	Applications per year	% fruit injury ^c	NN-Std
Acetamiprid 70WP	83		1999	TF 24	H dilute	4	83	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	113		1999	TF 24	H dilute	4	86	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	142		1999	TF 24	H dilute	4	92	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	167		1999	TF 24	H dilute	4	94	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	167		2000	CV 18	A 935	4	90	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	167		2000	CV 19	A 935	4	91	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	111		2000	TF 24	H dilute	4	69	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167		2000	TF 24	H dilute	4	59	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	111	0.25%	2000	TF 24	H dilute	4	74	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2000	TF 24	H dilute	4	79	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP d	235		2001	CV 18	A 935	4	87	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	235		2001	CV 18	H dilute	4	95	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	84	0.25%	2002	TF 24	H dilute	6	83	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	84	0.25%	2002	TF 24	H dilute	4	89	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	84	1.0%	2002	TF 24	H dilute	4	87	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167		2002	TF 24	H dilute	4	81	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2002	TF 24	H dilute	4	79	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	1.0%	2002	TF 24	H dilute	4	77	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	84		2002	TF 24	H dilute	4	69	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167		2002	CV 18	H dilute	4	94	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2002	CV 18	A 234	4	79	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2002	CV 18	A 935	4	72	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2002	CV 19	H dilute	4	79	---
Acetamiprid 70WP	235	0.25%	2002	TF 26	H dilute	4	88	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	80	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	70	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2003	TF 26	H dilute	4	75	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2003	CV 18	H dilute	4	79	---
Acetamiprid 70WP	167		2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	72	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	82	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	1.0%	2003	CV 19	H dilute	4	79	ns
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2003	CV 18	A 935	4	80	---
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2003	TF 16	A 935	4	84	---
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	4	92	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	4	87	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	6	95	*
Acetamiprid 70WP	167	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	4	91	*

Thiacloprid 480SC	211		2000	TF 24	H dilute	6	71	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	211		2001	CV 18	H dilute	8	97	ns
Thiacloprid 480SC	281		2001	CV 18	H dilute	8	97	ns
Thiacloprid 480SC	211		2002	CV 19	H dilute	5	79	---
Thiacloprid 480SC	211		2002	CV 19	H dilute	5	77	---
Thiacloprid 480SC	136		2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	57	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	136	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	56	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	203		2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	55	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	203	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	60	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	269		2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	72	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	269	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	72	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	168	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	43	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	168	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	53	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	203	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	50	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	269	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	58	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	203	0.25%	2003	TF 26	H dilute	4	76	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	203	0.25%	2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	72	*
Thiacloprid 480SC	203	0.25%	2003	CV 18	A 935	4	84	---
Thiacloprid 480SC	203	0.25%	2003	CV 18	A 935	4	89	---
Thiacloprid 4F	210	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	4	95	*

Clothianidin 50WDG	70/105 e		2003	TF 24	H dilute	6	6	*
Clothianidin 50WDG	105/214 e		2003	TF 24	H dilute	4	5	*
Clothianidin 50WDG	105	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	6	46	*
Clothianidin 50WDG	105	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	4	37	*
Clothianidin 50WDG	210	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	6	49	*
Clothianidin 50WDG	210	0.25%	2004	TF 24	H dilute	4	28	*

^* Mean fruit injury level was significantly higher (= less crop protection) than the OP standard treatment mean; ns, difference not significant; '---' indicates that a standard treatment was not included in the test.
^a Locations: TF, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center (home farm); CV, WSU Columbia View Farm.
^b Method: H, Handgun, A, Airblast
^c Percentage of fruit damage relative to the untreated check; values <100 indicate poorer control.
^d The OP standard in this trial was phosmet.
^e Rates for the 1st and 2nd generation of codling moth, respectively.