 |
|
Table 1. Effect of mating disruption on the number of moths captured in flight traps in 2001.
|
|
Site 1 |
Site 2 |
Date |
Treatmenta |
Control |
P (Treatment > Control) |
Treatment |
Control |
P (Treatment > Control) |
17-Apr |
1.1 ± 0.3* |
25.6 ± 4.7* |
< 0.0001 |
0.6 ± 0.2* |
8.9 ± 1.4* |
< 0.0001 |
24-Apr |
0.9 ± 0.4* |
34.5 ± 7* |
< 0.0001 |
2.9 ± 0.7* |
19.8 ± 3.1* |
< 0.0001 |
1-May |
2.3 ± 0.7* |
103.6 ± 13.8* |
< 0.0001 |
0.7 ± 0.3 |
64.2 ± 11.3* |
< 0.0001 |
8-May |
0.1 ± 0.1 |
37.8 ± 5.5* |
< 0.0001 |
0.6 ± 0.2* |
9.5 ± 1.5* |
< 0.0001 |
15-May |
2 ± 0.8* |
70.8 ± 10* |
< 0.0001 |
1.7 ± 0.3* |
20.3 ± 3.9* |
< 0.0001 |
22-May |
0.4 ± 0.3 |
12.3 ± 3.2* |
< 0.0001 |
1.1 ± 0.4* |
2.3 ± 0.6* |
ns |
29-May |
0 ± 0 |
21.8 ± 3.3* |
< 0.0001 |
0.4 ± 0.2* |
7.6 ± 1.5* |
< 0.0001 |
6-Jun |
0.1 ± 0.1 |
8.7 ± 2* |
< 0.0001 |
0.8 ± 0.4* |
1.3 ± 0.5* |
ns |
13-Jun |
0 ± 0 |
0.9 ± 0.3 |
< 0.0001 |
0.1 ± 0.1 |
1.3 ± 0.5* |
ns |
20-Jun |
0 ± 0 |
1.2 ± 0.6* |
< 0.0001 |
0 ± 0 |
0 ± 0 |
< 0.0001 |
27-Jun |
0 ± 0 |
2.3 ± 0.6 |
< 0.0001 |
0.5 ± 0.2* |
0.1 ± 0.1 |
ns |
4-Jul |
0 ± 0 |
0.3 ± 0.1* |
ns |
0.5 ± 0.2* |
0.9 ± 0.3* |
ns |
11-Jul |
0 ± 0 |
2.2 ± 0.7* |
< 0.0001 |
0.5 ± 0.1* |
0.4 ± 0.2* |
ns |
18-Jul |
0 ± 0 |
0.8 ± 0.2* |
0.0146 |
0.5 ± 0.2* |
0.4 ± 0.2* |
ns |
25-Jul |
0 ± 0 |
0.7 ± 0.3* |
0.032 |
0.3 ± 0.1 |
0.7 ± 0.5* |
ns |
1-Aug |
0.1 ± 0.1 |
1.7 ± 0.6* |
0.0042 |
0.5 ± 0.2* |
0.4 ± 0.2* |
ns |
8-Aug |
0.1 ± 0.1 |
7.8 ± 2.7* |
0.0016 |
3.1 ± 1* |
3.8 ± 1.6* |
ns |
15-Aug |
0.1 ± 0.1 |
11 ± 1.9* |
< 0.0001 |
0.9 ± 0.5* |
15.2 ± 2* |
< 0.0001 |
22-Aug |
0.6 ± 0.2* |
12.4 ± 1.5* |
< 0.0001 |
3.4 ± 0.7* |
24.6 ± 3.2* |
< 0.0001 |
29-Aug |
0.1 ± 0.1 |
7 ± 1.3* |
< 0.0001 |
3.3 ± 0.8* |
20.9 ± 4.1* |
< 0.0001 |
5-Sep |
0.5 ± 0.3 |
19.3 ± 4.9* |
< 0.0001 |
4.1 ± 1.4* |
6.8 ± 1.7* |
ns |
12-Sep |
4 ± 1.6* |
20.6 ± 3.9* |
< 0.0001 |
5.1 ± 0.9* |
22.4 ± 4* |
< 0.0001 |
|
aNavel orangeworm per trap per week ± standard error, n=16.
*Significantly > 0.
|
 |