 |
|
Table 5. Analysis of variance of ant abundance (log N) in pitfall traps for the effects of disturbance class, site and year.
|
Source of Variation |
DF |
MS |
F |
| Among subjects |
|
|
|
| Disturbance |
2 |
12.4 |
23.70*** |
| Site (Disturbance) |
6 |
0.35 |
0.67 ns |
| Sample (Site (Disturbance)) |
27 |
0.52 |
|
| Within subjects |
|
|
|
| Year |
2 |
1.72 |
8.52** |
| Year × Disturbance |
4 |
0.262 |
1.30 ns |
| Year × Site (Disturbance) |
12 |
0.723 |
3.58** |
| Sample (Year × Site (Disturbance)) |
54 |
0.202 |
|
|
Note: Repeated measures are on year. For the within-subject tests, the significance of F was determined for adjusted degrees of freedom, which equal the df multiplied by Huynh–Feldt epsilon, (0.73533).
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; ns, not significant.
|
 |