![]() |
The Pyrrhocoroidea (Hemiptera - Heteroptera) of the Ethiopian regionI.A.D. RobertsonP.O Box 162, Malindi, KenyaReceived 16 July 2002 Accepted 21 October 2003 Published 14 May 2004 Cite this paper as: Robertson IAD. 2004. The Pyrrhocoroidea (Hemiptera - Heteroptera) of the Ethiopian region. 44pp. Journal of Insect Science, 4:14, Available online: insectscience.org/4.14 The superfamily Pyrrhocoroidea Southwood 1956 is closely related to the Lygaeoidea and the Coreoidea, and was placed by many authors as a subfamily of the Lygaeidae. It was recognized as a separate family by Amyot and Serville in 1843 under the name 'Cecigenes' and they divided it into two groups 'Pyrrhocorides' and 'Largides'. These two names became recognized as subfamilies of the Pyrrhocoridae, the family name being established by Fieber (1861). Hussey (1929) quotes Van Duzee (1916), who established the name Euryophthalminae to replace Larginae and divided that subfamily into two tribes Euryophthalmini and Physopeltini. This nomenclature was dealt with in detail by China (1954) who established that Larginae is still the correct subfamily name. Van Duzee's tribe Euryophthalmini is confined to American genera. China (1954) states that because of their differing affinities, the Larginae being more closely related to the Lygaeidae and the Pyrrhocorinae to the Coreidae, both these subfamilies should assume family status. This change in status was followed by China and Miller (1959). Southwood (1956), following a study of the eggs of the Heteroptera, had also suggested that the families Largidae and Pyrrhocoridae together formed the superfamily Pyrrhocoroidea. This view was accepted and confirmed by Schaefer (1964) following detailed morphological investigations of representatives of the Lygaeoidea, Coreoidea and Pyrrhocoroidea. Schaefer also summarised the conclusions of other workers who had undertaken comparative studies of morphological characters within the three superfamilies. China and Miller (1959) used the following characters to typify the Pyrrhocoroidea:
Only 13 out of the 18 genera now recognised in the Ethiopian Region can be said to be brightly colored; the other five genera being dark in general coloration. The two families are: Largidae, Sixth visible (seventh actual) ventral abdominal segment in the female cleft in the middle; Pyrrhocoridae, Sixth visible ventral abdominal segment entire in both sexes. There does not seem to be any way to key out the males of the African Largidae (Physopelta) without dissection. Hussey (1929) lists 360 species worldwide in the superfamily Pyrrhocoroidea Southwood 1956 with 77 African species, in 13 genera, the genus Dysdercus containing 15 of these species. Since then, a number of new species have been described. This catalogue is based on the literature up to 2000 and the study of material in the National Museum of Kenya (NMK), Nairobi, which includes my own collections from east Africa, mainly Tanzania. The present check-list gives 102 species in 18 genera. The literature contains few references to the biology and ecology of the superfamily, being largely taxonomic. Only the genus Dysdercus, containing the 'cotton stainers' is of economic importance, and for that genus the literature is very extensive. For this reason the genus Dysdercus and the literature pertaining to it has been excluded from the present paper, except that, for completeness, it has been included in the list of species and the key to genera. Some of the other genera in the superfamily must be regarded as rare, few specimens being available in collections and in some, descriptions have been done on the basis of one or two specimens, sometimes only a single sex being known. Madagascar has been considered as being outside the scope of this work, as have the Mascarene Islands. KEY TO THE AFRICAN GENERAThe first key to separate the African genera was by Stål (1865). The next key specifically intended for genera in the Ethiopian Region was by Villiers and Dekeyser (1951), to allow placement of their newly described genus Sicnatus. The characters used by Stål (1865) and Villiers and Dekeyser (1951) are similar. The present key has been altered from theirs only to accommodate recently described genera. It is expected to be accurate only within the Ethiopian Region. Much information has been published in recent years on the detailed structure of the male and female genitalia, differences that are particularly useful in the determination of species, and which are quite diagnostic for some genera, for example, the crossed parameres of the genus Cenaeus. So far, however, less than half the species have been adequately studied and generic keys based on these characters should wait until knowledge is more complete.
- Sixth visible abdominal segment entire in both sexes (Family Pyrrhocoridae). 2
- Form not exceedingly ant like, at least not in the adult. Most genera macropterous 3
- Head not strongly bent down in front of the eyes. Various sizes and colors. Usually not brachypterous. 4
- Head not as above, usually more or less horizontal. 5
- Apex of corium rounded. Other characters different. 6
- Apical borders of third and fourth visible sternites sinuate laterally. Usually without a very long rostrum. 7
- Apex of the corium subequal to the corial-claval suture. 8
- Anterior discal area of pronotum limited by a clear lateral furrow, sometimes punctate, at least towards the front. 9
- Anterior and posterior discal areas of pronotum separated by a furrow, which may or may not be punctate. Borders of the pronotum more or less concave at the middle. 10
- Pronotum not as above. Other characters different. 11
- Pronotum not as above. Eyes sessile. 12
- First segment of rostrum not thick. Anterior discal area of pronotum not as above. 13
- First segment of rostrum not as above, sometimes exceeding the length of the head. 14
- First segment of rostrum not as above. Antennae without many bristles. 15
- Antennae not of this form. 16
- Antennae not of this form. Color not wholly black. 17
- First segment of antennae shorter than the second. Apex of first segment of rostrum does not reach prosternum. Smallish insects, (8 mm). General color black and reddish. FAMILY LARGIDAEThe family Largidae was established by Amyot and Serville (1843), under the name Largides, which can be regarded as a valid group name based on the generic name Largus Hahn 1831 (China 1954). It is represented in Africa only by three species in the large genus Physopelta Amyot and Serville 1843. The last generic description was by Stål (1865) and was done before all the African species had been described. Some of the detailed characters given by Stål, therefore, do not fit the African species too well. For example the description of the antennae only holds good for Physopelta festiva (Fabricius 1803). PHYSOPELTA Amyot & Serville 1843Type species: Physopelta erythrocephala Amyot & Serville 1843. (=Physopelta albofasciata (De Geer 1773). Designated by Distant (1903) and quoted as a logotype by (Hussey 1929).
Country of origin of type species: Java
Type depository: not known
Illustrations: see Physopelta festiva
Key to the African species modified from Leston (1969)
- Head plus body length less than 15 mm. 2
- Corium with a nearly complete black band. Pronotum with the frontal half pitchy-black. Side of the abdomen wholly black (10 - 12 mm). Physopelta analis (Signoret 1858)
|
| Physopelta analis Signoret 1858 | Signoret 1858: 306 | description |
| Odontopus analis Stål 1858 | Stål 1858: 441 | description |
| Pyrrhocoris analis Sign. | Stål 1863: 391 | |
| Pyrrhocoris analis Sign. | Stål 1866: 2 | description |
| Physopelta analis Sign. | Stål 1870: 101 | |
| Physopelta analis Sign. | Walker 1873: 17 | |
| Physopelta analis Sign. | Reuter 1882: 28 | |
| Physopelta analis Signoret | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 241 | |
| Physopelta analis Sign. | Haglund 1895: 464 | |
| Physopelta analis Sign. | Kirkaldy and Edwards 1902: 172 | |
| Physopelta analis (Signoret) | Hussey 1929: 29 | |
| Physopelta analis Sign. | Blöte 1931: 99 | |
| Physopelta analis Signoret | Schmidt 1931: 46 | |
| Physopelta analis (Signoret 1858) | Leston 1969: 225 | |
| Physopelta analis (Signoret) | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
| Lygaeus festivus Fabricius 1803 | Fabricius 1803: 220 | description |
| Pyrrhocoris festivus Fabr. | Burmeister 1835: 285 | |
| Physopelta festiva Fabr. | Stål 1868: 79 | description |
| Physopelta festiva Fabr. | Stål 1870: 101 | |
| Physopelta festiva Fabr. | Walker 1873: 17 | description |
| Physopelta festiva Fabricius | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 242 | |
| Physopelta festiva Fabr. | Haglund 1895: 463 | |
| Physopelta festiva F. | Aulmann 1912: 120 | illustration description |
| Physopelta festiva (Fabricius) | Hussey 1929: 30 | |
| Physopelta festiva F. | Blöte 1931: 99 | |
| Physopelta festiva (Fabricius) | Villiers 1967: 370 | |
| Physopelta festiva | Leston 1969: 225 | |
| Physopelta festiva (Fabricius) | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
| Physopelta melanoptera Distant 1904 | Distant 1904: 61 | description |
| Physopelta melanoptera Dist. | Distant 1909: 78 | |
| Physopelta melanoptera Dist. | Bergroth 1913a: 167 | |
| Physopelta melanoptera Distant | Hussey 1929: 32 | |
| Physopelta melanoptera Distant | Villiers 1967: 370 | |
| Physopelta melanoptera | Leston 1969: 225 | |
| Physopelta melanoptera Distant | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
Collected in Tanzania October-May. In West Africa associated with Mallotus oppositifolius (Euphorbiaceae) (Leston, 1969; Duviard, 1974).
This is a large genus, mainly found in the Oriental and Australasian Regions. Three species are recorded from the Ethiopean region by Hussey (1929) but on examination of material in the National Museum of Kenya it was found that the third species, Antilochus violaceus Carlini 1892, is not a member of this genus at all, but definitely belongs to the genus Odontopus Laporte. An unnamed specimen of Odontopus in the NMK collection, from Somalia, matches Carlini's description very closely. Consequently, only two species of the Genus Antilochus are present in the Ethiopian Region, one is West African, the other is confined to Eastern and Southern Africa.
| Antilochus Stål 1863 | Stål 1863: 393 | |
| Antilochus Stål | Stål 1866: 3 and 4 | |
| Antilochus Stål | Stål 1870: 101 and 103 | |
| Odontopus De Lap. | Walker 1872: 174 | |
| Neaeretus Reuter 1887 | Reuter 1887: 92 | (syn. Bergroth 1894) |
| Antilochus Stål | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 243 | |
| Antilochus Stål | Bergroth 1894a: 358 | |
| Antilochus Stål | Breddin 1901: 175 | |
| Antilochus Stål | Kirkaldy and Edwards 1902: 166 | |
| Antilochus Stål | Distant 1904: 100 | |
| Antilochus Stål | Hussey 1929: 36 | |
| Antilochus Stål | Schmidt 1932: 236 |
The two species of Antilochus can easily be separated by the very different appearance of the pronotum and elytra:
| Lygaeus boerhaviae Fabricius 1794 | Fabricius 1794: 152 | |
| Lygaeus boerhaviae Fabricius | Fabricius 1803: 220 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabr. | Stål 1866: 4 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabr. | Stål 1868: 81 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabr. | Stål 1870: 104 | |
| Odontopus boerhaviae Fabr. | Walker 1872: 176 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabricius | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 343 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae (F.) | Karsch 1894: 106 | |
| Antilochus submaculatus Kirby 1896 | Kirby 1896: 268 | (syn. Distant 1902) |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabr. | Distant 1902b: 36 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabr. | Distant 1902b: 36 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae (Fabr.) | Kirkaldy and Edwards 1902: 172 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabricius | Courteaux 1922: 285 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae (Fabricius) | Hussey 1929: 37 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae F. | Blöte 1931: 102 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabricius | Schmidt 1932: 240 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabricius | Villiers 1953: 298 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae Fabricius | Linnavuori 1978: 7 | |
| Antilochus boerhaviae (Fabricius) | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
The illustration given by Kirby (1896) of the specimen he described as Antilochus submaculatus is not the same as a typical specimen of A. boerhaviae, with which it was synonymised by Distant (1902), but may be an extreme form.
| Odontopus nigrocruciatus Stål 1855 | Stål 1855a: 35 |
| Antilochus nigro-cruciatus Stål | Stål 1863: 395 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus Stål | Stål 1866: 5 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus Stål | Stål 1870: 104 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus (Fabr.) | Walker 1872: 176 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus Stål | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 243 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus Stål | Bergroth 1920: 17 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus Stål | Hussey 1929: 40 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus Stål | Blöte 1931: 104 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus Stål | Schmidt 1932: 240 |
| Antilochus nigrocruciatus St. | Mancini 1961: 31 |
The genus Callibaphus (Stål 1868) is confined to the Ethiopian Region and only three species have been described. These insects are very large and are rare in collections. Distribution is very much West African in published papers, reaching as far east as Uganda. Bergroth (1906) described a third species Callibaphus gigas from the Comoro Islands which are outside the Ethiopean Region, but it is included because Bergroth himself indicated that he thought his specimen to be conspecific with Callibaphus longirostris (Drury 1782). C. gigas has never formally been synonymised, probably because of the great gap between its location and those of all the other published records. The type would have to be examined before a decision could be reached.
| Roscius (Callibaphus) Stål 1868 | Stål 1868: 82 | description |
| Callibaphus Stål | Stål 1870: 108 | |
| Callibaphus Stål | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 245 | |
| Callibaphus Stål | Hussey 1929: 50 | |
| Callibaphus Stål | Schmidt 1932: 246 |
The two African species may be separated quite easily, although the black markings both species bear on the pronotum and elytra are quite similar and are not useful as characters for separating the species:
| Callibaphus albipennis Distant 1914 | Distant 1914: 180 | description |
| Callibaphus albipennis Distant | Hussey 1929: 51 |
| Cimex longirostris Drury 1782 | Drury 1782: 60 | description, illustration |
| Lygaeus guineensis Fabricius 1803 | Fabricius 1803: 216 | description (syn. Stål 1868) |
| Roscius (Callabaphis) longirostris Drury | Stål 1868: 83 | description |
| Cimex longirostris Drury | Stål 1870: 108 | |
| Roscius longirostris Drury | Walker 1872: 173 | description |
| Roscius fasciatus Walker 1872 | Walker 1872: 174 | (syn. Leth. & Serv. 1894) |
| Callibaphus longirostris Drury | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 245 | |
| Callibaphus longirostris Dru. | Distant 1902b: 37 | |
| Callibaphus longirostrus (Drury) | Kirkaldy and Edwards 1902: 172 | |
| Callibaphus gigas Bergroth 1906 | Bergroth 1906: 199 | description |
| Callibaphus gigas Bergr. | Bergroth 1913a: 169 | |
| Callibaphus gigas Bergroth | Hussey 1929: 51 | |
| Callibaphus longirostris (Drury) | Hussey 1929: 51 | |
| Callibaphus longirostris Drury | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Callibaphus longirostris Drury | Schmidt 1932: 246 | |
| Callibaphus longirostris Drury | Villiers 1953: 298 | |
| Callibaphus longirostris (Drury) | Villiers 1967: 371 | |
| Callibaphus longirostris (Drury) | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
Earlier data indicate that this species is confined to West Africa, Cameroon and Congo (Brazzaville). Bergroth (1906) described C. gigas from the Comoro Islands and indicated that it seemed very likely to be a variety of C. longirostris. A record from Tanzania in the National Museum of Kenya provides a possible link between the very widely separated populations in West Africa and the Comoro Islands.
The genus Roscius is confined to the Ethiopian region and five species have been described. The genus is characterized by the fact that the apical border of the corium is much longer than the commisure of the corium-clavus. This character reflects the slender elongate shape of all the species in the genus.
| Roscius Stål 1866 | Stål 1866: 8 |
| Roscius Stål | Stål 1870: 102 |
| Roscius Stål | Walker 1872: 173 |
| Roscius Stål | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 245 |
| Roscius Stål | Hussey 1929: 51 |
| Roscius Stål | Schmidt 1932: 246 |
Five species are described in the published literature, although the status of Roscius elongatus and Roscius quadriplagiatus, both originally described by Schaum in 1853, is doubtful. As no authentic specimen of Roscius elongatus (Schaum 1853) is available it has been left out of the key below.
| Pyrrhocoris elongatus Schaum 1853 | Schaum1853: 358 | description |
| Pyrrhocoris elongatus Schaum | Schaum 1862: 46 | description |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Stål 1866: 8 | description |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Stål 1870: 109 | |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Walker 1872: 173 | |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Gerstäcker 1892: 50 | |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Bergroth 1893: 126 | |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 245 | |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Montandon 1899 | |
| Roscius elongatus (Schaum) | Hussey 1929: 51 | |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Schmidt 1932: 247 | |
| Roscius elongatus Schaum | Villiers 1967: 372 |
This species is widely distributed in southern and eastern Africa. It seems to be very closely related to Roscius quadriplagiatus (Schaum 1853) according to the written descriptions (Schaum 1853, repeated in 1862): Pyrrhocoris quadriplagiatus Schaum; Supra niger, capite thoracisque marginibus rufus, elytrorum maculis duabus flavis, subtus rufus, pectoris lateribus antennis pedibusque nigris. Long 8 lin (= 16.8 mm). Pyrrhocoris elongatus Schaum; Supra niger, epistomate, thoracis margine antico et postico, elytrorum maculis duabus rufis, anteriori sublunata, subtus rufus, pectoris lateribus pedibusque nigris. Long 10 lin (= 21.0 mm).
| Roscius guilielmi Bergroth 1926 | Bergroth 1926: 11 | description |
| Roscius guilielmi Bergroth | Hussey 1929: 52 | |
| Roscius guilielmi Bergroth | Villiers 1953: 298 | |
| Roscius guilielmi Bergroth | Villiers 1967: 372 |
This spceies has a West African distribution, and specimens in the NMK collection from western Uganda probably reflect the eastern limit of its range.
| Roscius illustris Gerstäcker 1873 | Gerstäcker 1873: 414 | description, illustration |
| Roscius illustris Gerst. | Gerstäcker 1892: 50 | |
| Roscius illustris Gerstaecker | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 245 | |
| Roscius illustris Gerstäcker | Hussey 1929: 52 | |
| Roscius illustris Gerst. | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Roscius illustris Gerstäcker | Schmidt 1932: 247 |
| Pyrrhocoris quadriplagiatus Schaum 1853 | Schaum 1853: 358 | description |
| Pyrrhocoris quadriplagiatus Schaum | Schaum 1862: 45 | description |
| Roscius quadriplagiatus Schaum | Stål 1870: 108 | |
| Roscius quadriplagiatus Schaum | Walker 1872: 173 | |
| Roscius quadriplagiatus Schaum | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 245 | |
| Roscius quadriplagiatus Schaum | Hussey 1929: 52 | |
| Roscius quadriplagiatus Schaum | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Roscius quadriplagiatus Schaum | Schmidt 1932: 247 |
In the published literature this species is recorded from Mozambique and Gabon, but specimens in the NMK collection extend the range. The written descriptions of Roscius elongatus (Schaum 1853) and Roscius quadriplagiatus (Schaum 1853), as given above, make it doubtful if this species is different from Roscius elongatus (Schaum 1853).
| Roscius quadriplagiatus Schaum | Walker 1872: 173 | description |
| Roscius circumdatus Distant 1881 | Distant 1881: 275 | description, illustration |
| Roscius circumdatus Distant | Haglund 1895: 465 | |
| Roscius circumdatus Dist. | Bergroth 1920: 3 | description |
| Antilochus arcifer Bergroth 1920 | Bergroth 1920: 3 | (syn. Schmidt 1932) |
| Antilochus arcifer Bergroth | Hussey 1929: 36 | |
| Roscius circumdatus Distant | Schmidt 1932: 247 | description | Roscius circumdatus Distant | Linnavuori 1988: 16 |
Hussey (1929) listed fifteen species in this genus, of which only six occurred in the Ethiopian Region. Since Hussey's catalogue was published two more species and one new variety have been described from the Ethiopian Region. All the members of the genus have a very similar appearance and all seem to be associated with the plant families Sterculiaceae and Malvaceae.
In 1904 Kirkaldy proposed the name Probergrothius for this genus as a replacement for Odontopus Laporte 1832, on the grounds that the name was preoccupied by a genus of Coleoptera, described by Siebermann. The details of priority had already been established by Alluaud (1889) fifteen years before Kirkaldy made his proposal. Kirkaldy himself realised that the name Odontopus was not validly preoccupied (Kirkaldy 1905), and this view was supported by Distant (1919). Only Hesse (1925) accepted the new name. However, Stehlik (1966) renewed the claim that Odontopus Laporte 1832 is preoccupied by a genus of Coleoptera described under the name Odontopus by Say (1831). Stehlik therefore proposes that the name Probergrothius Kirkaldy 1904 be reinstated for the Ethiopian and Oriental species in the genus (the Madagascaran species having been transferred to a new genus). In this work, the name Odontopus is retained in the hope that the renaming of this large genus will be referred to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature for their consideration.
| Odontopus Laporte 1832 | Laporte 1832: 37 | description |
| Odontopus Lap. | Amyot and Serville 1843: 270 | description |
| Odontopus | Herrich-Schaffer 1853: 174 | description |
| Odontopus Lap. | Stål 1861: 196 | |
| Odontopus Lap. | Stål 1866: 3 | description |
| Odontopus Lap. | Stål 1870: 102 | description |
| Odontopus Laporte | Alluaud 1889: LXV | |
| Odontopus de Castelnau | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 246 | |
| Odontopus Laporte | Distant 1903: 108 | description |
| Probergrothius Kirkaldy 1904 | Kirkaldy 1904: 280 | (syn Distant 1919) |
| Odontopus | Kirkaldy 1905: 79 | |
| Odontopus Laporte | Distant 1919: 2 |
Odontopus angolensis Distant 1902 and Odontopus obscurellus Blöte 1933, which is only known from Zimbabwe, are not included because I have not seen specimens.
| Odontopus angolensis Distant 1902 | Distant 1902b: 38 | description |
| Odontopus angolensis Dist. | Bergroth 1913a: 169 | |
| Odontopus angolensis Distant | Hussey 1929: 52 | |
| Odontopus angolensis Dist. | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Odontopus angolensis Distant | Schmidt 1932: 249 |
| Odontopus confusus Distant 1902 | Distant 1902b: 39 | description |
| Odontopus confusus Dist. | Bergroth 1913a: 169 | |
| Odontopus confusus Distant | Hussey 1929: 52 | |
| Odontopus confusus Dist. | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Odontopus confusus Distant | Schmidt 1932: 249 |
Breeding on or in association with Sterculia appendiculata, Sterculia quinqueloba, Sterculia africana, Adansonia digitata (Baobab) and Ceiba pentandra (Kapok). Also a few in association with cotton, dolichos, castor, cassava, pigeonpea, Sida sp.and Calotropis procera, although none of these need be considered as important hosts. At Ukiriguru (Tanzania) batches of eggs were laid by caged pairs and averaged 28 eggs (24-36) per batch.
| Cenaeus exsanguis Gerstäcker 1892 | Gerstäcker 1892:50 | description |
| Odontopus schoutedeni Bergroth 1903 | Bergroth 1903: 290 | description (syn. Distant 1919) |
| Odontopus schoutedeni Berg. | Bergroth 1906: 371 | |
| Cenaeus exsanguis Gerst. | Bergroth 1913a: 169 | |
| Odontopus confusus Distant | Distant 1919: 219 | |
| Odontopus exsanguis (Gerstäcker) | Hussey 1929: 53 | |
| Odontopus exsanguis Gerstäcker | Schmidt 1932: 249 |
| Odontopus modestus Distant 1902 | Distant 1902b: 38 | description |
| Odontopus modestus Dist. | Bergroth 1903: 291 | |
| Odontopus modestus Dist. | Schouteden 1905: 1 | |
| Odontopus modestus Dist. | Bergroth 1913a: 170 | |
| Odontopus modestus Distant | Hussey 1929: 53 | |
| Probergrothius modestus (Distant 1902) | Linnavuori 1986: 109 |
| Odontopus notalilis Distant 1902 | Distant 1902a: 42 | description, illustration |
| Odontopus notabilis Distant | Bergroth 1903: 291 | description |
| Odontopus aulmanni Schumacher | Schumacher 1912: 121 | description, illustration (syn. Bergroth 1913) |
| Odontopus notabilis Dist. | Bergroth 1913a: 170 | |
| Odontopus notabilis Distant | Hussey 1929: 54 | |
| Odontopus notabilis Dist. | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Odontopus notabilis Distant | Goursat 1931b: 266 | description, illustration |
| Odontopus notabilis Distant | Schmidt 1932: 249 |
This variety of O. notabilis was described by Goursat 1931 from a specimen originating in Kambove (Democratic Republic of Congo, Shaba). The main difference between it and the nominate form is that it lacks the distinct rounded black spot at the apex of the corium. This variety is well represented in the National Museums of Kenya collection and the specimens come from two of the same localities in western Tanzania as did the nominate species, obviously part of the same collections.
Measurements: average length, male 16.7 mm (8), female 21.0 mm (5)
| Odontopus obscurellus Blöte 1933 | Blöte 1933b: 592 | description |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Laporte 1832 | Laporte 1832: 37 | description, illustration |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Spinola 1837: 178 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Amyot and Serville 1843: 271 | description |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Guerin-Meneville 1849- 341 | illustration |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Herrich-Schaffer 1850: 178 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Laporte | Schaum 1862: 44 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Stål 1863: 392 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Stål 1866: 6 | description |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Stål 1870: 109 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus de Lap. | Walker 1872: 175 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Bergroth 1893: 126 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus de Castelnau | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 246 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus (Lap.) | Distant 1900: 48 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Bergroth 1913b: 239 | |
| Probergrothius sexpunctatus de Castelnau | Hesse 1925: 86 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Laporte | Hussey 1929: 55 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Laporte | Schmidt 1932: 248 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Castelnau | Villiers 1950a: 323 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Lap. | Risbec 1951: 248 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Laporte | Schouteden 1957: 263 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus Laporte | Villiers 1967: 372 | |
| Odontopus sexpunctatus (Lp.) | Linnavuori 1978: 7 | |
| Probergrothius sexpunctatus (Laporte de Castelnau) | Linnavuori 1988: 16 |
This species is very widespread in the Ethiopian Region. There are two distinct forms, one with a blackish appearance, the other being reddish, although in both the spots on the corium are black. The reddish form is the one originally described by Laporte de Castelnau in 1832, from Senegal, and his illustration (Plate IX, Figs. 5 and 5a) shows two separate spots near the base of each corium; in this form the anterior area of the pronotum is red. It is also illustrated by Stehlik 1966b (Plates III and IV). The other form, illustrated in Guerin-Meneville (1847-51, Plate 6, Fig. 6) and referred to in the caption as Astemma percheroni, shows the two basal spots on the corium coalesced into a single transverse spot, retaining the single spot near the apex of the corium. In this form the anterior area of the pronotum is black. The NMK collection has specimens of the black form from Kenya, Sudan and Uganda and the red form from Tanzania.
| Odontopus somaliensis Goursat 1931 | Goursat 1931a: 167 | description |
| Odontopus somaliensis Goursat | Mancini 1954: 166 |
| Antilochus violaceus Carlini 1892 | Carlini 1892: 532 | description |
| Antilochus violaceus Goursat | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 243 | |
| Antilochus violaceus Goursat | Hussey 1929: 41 |
This genus, first described by Karsch (1892) and based on hairy insects collected in Cameroon, was revised by Stehlik in 1965. Stehlik's treatment of the genus concentrated on the use of the details of the male and female genitalia to determine species and this represented a major advance in the knowledge of the taxonomy of the superfamily.
Hussey (1929) listed only two species in the genus, but following Stehlik (1965a) the number now stands at fourteen. Only one of these is a new species, Sericocoris obuduanus Linnavuori 1988. The rest have been transferred, by Stehlik (1965a), from other genera on the basis of detailed study of the genitalia. The genus is confined to the Ethiopian Region and the species are mostly rare in collections. Little is recorded in the published literature about the ecology of the species, although from the distribution and localities in which they have been found, they are most likely to be associated with forest habitats. Five of the fourteen species in the genus have been recorded as occurring in Eastern Africa, including Rwanda; the rest are West African, with Democratic Republic of Congo being the most easterly country.
In a large genus such as this, when many species are not available for study, the older written published descriptions have been found to be inadequate. The problem is mainly that authors have not followed a standard pattern of description and one is often left wondering about what has been left out. This lack is emphasized by the detailed and well illustrated paper of Stehlik (1965a).
| Sericocoris Karsch 1892 | Karsch 1892: 132 | |
| Sericocoris Karsch | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 245 | |
| Sericocoris Karsch | Karsch 1894: 106 | |
| Hathor Kirkaldy & Edwards 1902 | Kirkaldy and Edwards 1902: 168 | (syn. Bergroth 1912) |
| Sericocoris Karsch | Bergroth 1912: 316 | |
| Sericocoris Karsch | Bergroth 1913a: 169 | |
| Sericocoris Karsch | Distant 1919: 220 | |
| Sericocoris Karsch | Hussey 1929: 50 | |
| Sericocoris Karsch | Schmidt 1932: 245 | |
| Sericocoris Karsch | Stehlik 1965a: 220 |
Stehlik divided the genus into three subgenera depending on the degree of hairiness of the species:
Sericocoris, hairy
Sericocoriopsis, dorsal surface of the body almost hairless, but some pubescence on the ventral surface. This character seems quite variable.
Pseudocenaeus, hairless. This subgenus contains species that are smaller and more slender than the two subgenera noted above.
| Sericocoris acromelanthesKarsch 1892 | Karsch 1892: 133 | illustration |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 245 | |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Karsch 1894: 106 | |
| Hathor zoraida Kirkaldy & Edwards 1902 | Kirkaldy and Edwards 1902: 168 | illustration (syn. Bergroth 1913) |
| Sericocoris cosmohyme Strand 1910 | Strand 1910: 151 | illustration (syn. Bergroth 1913) |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Schumacher 1912: 319 | |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Bergroth 1913a: 169 | |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Hussey 1929: 50 | |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Blöte 1931: 108 | |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Schmidt 1932: 245 | |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch
Var. unifasciata Villiers 1950
Var. nigrithorax Villiers 1950 |
Villiers 1950b: 640 | illustration |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Villiers 1953: 298 | |
| Sericocoris (Sericocoris) acromelanthes Karsch | Stehlik 1965a: 222 | illustration |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Villiers 1967: 371 | |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
| Sericocoris cuneatus Villiers 1951 | Villiers 1951: 145 | description,
illustration |
| Sericocoris (Sericocoris) cuneatus Villiers | Stehlik 1965a: 222 | illustration |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Haglund 1895: 464 | description |
| Sericocoris johnstoni Distant 1902 | Distant 1902a: 43 | description |
| Sericocoris acromelanthes Karsch | Schouteden 1957: 262 | description |
| Sericocoris (Sericocoriopsis) johnstoni Distant | Stehlik 1965a: 223 | illustration |
| Sericocoris johnstoni Distant | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
| Cenaeus dispar Schouteden 1957 | Schouteden 1957: 265 | description |
| Sericocoris (Sericocoriopsis) dispar (Schouteden) | Stehlik 1965a: 223 | illustration |
| Cenaeus sanguinolentus Haglund 1895 | Haglund 1895: 465 | |
| Cenaeus sanguinolentus Hagl. | Schumacher 1912: 319 | |
| Cenaeus sanguinolentus Hagl. | Bergroth 1913a: 171 | |
| Cenaeus sanguinolentus Haglund | Hussey 1929: 67 | |
| Sericocoris sanguineus Villiers 1951 | Villiers 1951: 146 | illustration (syn. Stehlik 1965) |
| Sericocoris (Sericocoriopsis) sanguinolentus (Haglund) | Stehlik 1965a: 146 |
| Pyrrhocoris nigriceps Stål 1855 | Stål 1855a: 35 | |
| Cenaeus nigriceps Stål | Stål 1861: 196 | |
| Odontopus nigriceps Stål | Stål 1866: 7 | |
| Dindymus nigriceps Stål | Stål 1870: 113 | |
| Odontopus nigriceps Stål | Walker 1872: 175 | |
| Dindymus nigriceps Stål | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 247 | |
| Dindymus natalensis Distant 1902 | Distant 1902b: 40 | (syn. Stehlik 1965) |
| Cenaeus kilimanus Schouteden 1910 | Schouteden 1910: 152 | (syn. Stehlik 1965) |
| Cenaeus usambarae Schouteden 1910 | Schouteden 1910: 152 | (syn. Stehlik 1965) |
| Dindymus natalensis Dist. | Bergroth 1913a: 170 | |
| Dindymus nigriceps (Stål) | Hussey 1929: 60 | |
| Cenaeus kilimanus Schouteden | Hussey 1929: 67 | |
| Cenaeus usambarae Schouteden | Hussey 1929: 68 | |
| Cenaeus ornatus Villiers 1951 | Villiers 1951: 143 | illustration (syn. Stehlik 1965) |
| Cenaeus kilimanus Schouteden | Schouteden 1957: 264 | |
| Cenaeus usambarae Schouteden | Schouteden 1957: 264 | |
| Sericocoris (Pseudocenaeus) nigriceps (Stål) | Stehlik 1965a: 223 | illustration |
| Cenaeus luridus Reuter 1882 | Reuter 1882: 28 | |
| Cenaeus luridus Reuter | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 248 | |
| Cenaeus gowdeyi Bergroth 1912 | Bergroth 1912b: 194 | (syn. Stehlik 1965) |
| Cenaeus gowdeyi Bergroth | Bergroth 1913a: 171 | |
| Cenaeus gowdeyi Berg. | Bergroth 1926: 12 | |
| Cenaeus gowdeyi Bergroth | Hussey 1929: 66 | |
| Cenaeus luridus Reuter | Hussey 1929: 67 | |
| Cenaeus ochraceus Blöte 1933 | Blöte 1933a: 2 | (syn. Stehlik 1965) |
| Cenaeus luridus Reuter | Villiers 1953: 298 | |
| Cenaeus ochraceus Blöte | Villiers 1953: 29 | |
| Sericocoris (Pseudocenaeus) luridus (Reuter) | Stehlik 1965a: 224 | illustration |
| Sericocoris luridus R. | Linnavuori 1978: 8 | |
| Sericocoris luridus Reuter | Linnavuori 1988: 13 | |
| Sericocoris gowdeyi Bergroth | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
| Cenaeus distinguendus Blöte 1933 | Blöte 1933b: 594 | description |
| Cenaeus distinguendus Blöte | Villiers 1953: 299 | |
| Sericocoris (Pseudocenaeus) distinguendus (Blöte) | Stehlik 1965a: 224 | |
| Sericocoris distinguendus (Blöte) | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
| Cenaeus obscuratus Blöte 1933 | Blöte 1933b: 593 | description |
| Sericocoris (Pseudocenaeus) obscuratus (Blöte) | Stehlik 1965a: 225 |
| Cenaeus roseus Villiers 1951 | Villiers 1951: 141 | description |
| Cenaeus roseus Villiers | Villiers 1953: 298 | |
| Sericocoris (Pseudocenaeus) roseus (Villiers) | Stehlik 1965a: 225 | illustration |
| Sericocoris roseus (Villiers) | Linnavuori 1988: 14 |
| Cenaeus montanus Villiers 1951 | Villiers 1951: 142 | description |
| Cenaeus montanus Villiers | Villiers 1953: 298 | |
| Sericocoris (Pseudocenaeus) montanus (Villiers) | Stehlik 1965a: 225 | |
| Sericocoris montanus (Villiers) | Linnavuori 1988: 13 |
| Cenaeus plebejus Haglund 1895 | Haglund 1895: 466 | description |
| Cenaeus plebejus Hagl. | Bergroth 1913a: 171 | |
| Cenaeus plebejus Haglund | Hussey 1929: 67 | |
| Sericocoris (Pseudocenaeus) plebejus (Haglund) | Stehlik 1965a: 225 |
| Odontopus apicicornis Fairmaire 1858 | Fairmaire 1858: 307 |
| Cenaeus apicicornis Fairm. | Stål 1863: 404 |
| Cenaeus apicicornis Fairm. | Stål 1866: 9 |
| Cenaeus apicicornis Fairm. | Stål 1870: 113 |
| Pyrrhocoris apicicornis Fairm. | Walker 1872: 170 |
| Cenaeus apicicornis (Fairm.) | Karsch 1894: 106 |
| Cenaeus apicicornis Fairmaire | Lethierry and Severin 1894: 248 |
| Cenaeus apicicornis Fairm. | Haglund 1895: 465 |
| Cenaeus apicicornis (Fairmaire) |