The Journal of Insect Science: Volume 3/Article 4/Table 1

Table 1 Compounds used in this study

Compound	R	mp (°C)	ID₅₀ (nmol)^a
1	H AIO	132-134	NA^b
2	2-Br AIO	129-130	NA^b
3	2-Cl AIO	118-120	NA^b
4	2-Me AIO	oil	NA^b
5	2-Et AIO	61-63	84.4(71.4-99.8)
6	2-i-Pr AIO	89-91	NA^b
7	4-Cl AIO	163-165	NA^b
8	4-I AIO	144-145	NA^b
9	4-CF₃ AIO	133-134	NA^b
10	4-Et AIO	120-121	NA^b
11	4-EtO AIO	156-158	NA^b
12	2-Me,3-I AIO	105-106	NA^b
13	2-Cl,4-Br AIO	135-136	NA^b
14	2,4-(MeO)₂ AIO	113-115	106.0(71.2-435.1)
15	2-MeO,5-Cl AIO	135-136	NA^b
16	2-MeO,5-Me AIO	85-86	28.9(21.0-36.4)
17	2,6-Me₂ AIO	oil	NA^b
18	2-Me,6-Et AIO	102-104	5.1(1.2-13.8)
19	2-Me,6-i-Pr AIO	oil	NA^b
20	2-Et,6-i-Pr AIO	172-174	NA^b
21	2,6-Et₂ AIO	103-105	64.0(55.0-74.4)
22	2,6-(i-Pr)₂ AIO	169-170	NA^b
23	3-NO₂,4-Cl AIO	154-156	70.9(57.1-91.5)
24	3-CF₃,4-Cl AIO	167-168	NA^b
25	2-Me AII	144-145	NA^b
26	2-Et AII	103-104	NA^b
27	2,6-Me₂ AII	159-160	NA^b
28	2-Me,6-Et AII	149-150	NA^b
29	2-Et,6-i-Pr AII	200-201	NA^b
30	2,6-Et₂ AII	168-169	NA^b
31	2,6-(i-Pr)₂ AII	234-235	NA^b
32	2,4,6-Me₃ AII	174-175	NA^b
33	H AIT	174-176	NA^b
34	2-Et AIT	59-61	NA^b
35	2,4-Me₂ AIT	106-108	NA^b
36	2,4,6-Me₃ AIT	99-101	NA^b
37	2,6-Me₂ AIT	169-171	82.4(69.4-97.7)
38	2-Me,6-Et AIT	oil	31.3(10.8-48.3)
39	2,6-Et₂ AIT	72-74	19.5(16.0-23.8)
40	2-Et,6-i-Pr AIT	138-140	NA^b
41	2-Me SBT	oil	9.3(4.5-13.6)
42	3-F SBT	oil	NA^b
43	3-Me SBT	oil	25.8(14.1-36.6)
44	4-Me SBT	oil	NA^b
45	2-Me STO	oil	47.9(36.6-60.9)
46	3-Me STO	oil	NA^b
47	4-Me STO	oil	NA^b
48	2-Me SBO	118-120	NA^b
49	2-Cl,4-F SBO	99-100	NA^b
50	3-Cl,4-F SBO	90-92	NA^b
51	CBP	154-155	NA^b
52	CDM	oil	NA^b
53	DIP	oil	NA^b
54	MTO	oil	40.4(13.1-252.1)
55	NIO	110-111	NA^b
56	ODA	oil	NA^b
57	ODO	172-173	NA^b
58	PEO	123-124	3.5(2.3-5.0)
59	PIT	210-211	57.1(48.4-67.4)

^aCalling-behavior inhibitors were screened using five replicates of 10 adult female moths which were collected 24 h after emergence. The abdomen of moths were topically applied with synthetic test compounds dissolved in 1 µl methanol at the beginning of the onset of the first scotophase. Control females were topically applied with 1 µl methanol alone. The treated females were isolated in test tubes for 3 h and their calling behavior were observed. The response was taken as quantal (calling/not calling). ID_50^s were calculated by a sigmoidal curve-fitting program designed for log dose-probit activity analyses using a Macintosh personal computer system. In parentheses, 95% confidence limit values are shown.

^bDid not inhibit significantly at 100 nmol.