| Product | Rate* or units for LC50 | Method1 | Relative acute susceptibility2 or LC50 | Citation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larvae | Adults | ||||
| Abamectin + petroleum oil | 0.0015 + 1.0 % AI | L:R(s) | High | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Alphamethrin | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 87.93 | 100.04 | (Cho et al., 1997) |
| Azadiractin | 1.25 ml/l | L:DR(s) | — | Low | (Smith and Krischik, 2000) |
| Azocyclotin | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | >40,000 | >40,000 | (Cho et al., 1996) |
| Beauvaria bassiana, strain GHA | 7.5 ml/l | L:DR(s) | — | Low | (Smith and Krischik, 2000) |
| Bifenzate | 0.001% (AI) | L:DR(s) | Moderate | — | (James, 2002) |
| Carbaryl | 5.21 ml/l | L:DR(s) | — | High | (Smith and Krischik, 2000) |
| Chlorpyrifos | 0.45% AI | L:D(s) | High | — | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| Chlorpyrifos | 0.45% AI | L:R(s) | High | — | (Michaud, 2000d) |
| Deltamethrin | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 19.65 | 89.35 | (Cho et al., 1997) |
| Dicofol | 0.03% AI | L:D(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Dicofol | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | >80,000 | >80,000 | (Cho et al., 1996) |
| Dicofol | 0.03% AI | L:R(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Dichlorbenzuron | 62.5 ml/l | L:D(s) | Low | — | (Sun et al., 1999) |
| Dichlorbenzuron | 62.5 ml/l | L:O | Low | — | (Sun et al., 1999) |
| Diflubenzuron | 0.03% AI | L:D(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Diflubenzuron | 0.03% AI | L:R(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Esfenvalerate | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 30.53 | 8.09 | (Cho et al., 1997) |
| Ethion + petroleum oil | 0.003% AI | L:D(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| Ethion + petroleum oil | 0.003% AI | L:R(s) | Moderate | — | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| Fenbutatin oxide | 0.24% AI | L:D(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Fenbutatin oxide | 0.24% AI | L:R(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Fenpropathrin | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 22.81 | 263.42 | (Cho et al., 1997) |
| Fenpropathrin | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 22.81 | 263.42 | (Cho et al., 1996) |
| Fenpropathrin | 0.5% AI | L:R(s) | High | — | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| Fenpropathrin | 100 mg/l | L:D(s) | High | — | (Sun et al., 1999) |
| Fenpyroximate | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | >12,000 | 1811.04 | (Cho et al., 1996) |
| Halofenozide | mg/l | L:O | — | 67.1 | (Carton et al., 2003) |
| Imidacloprid | 0.053 kg(AI)/ha | F:(s) | Low | Low | (Wells et al., 2001) |
| Imidacloprid | 0.005% AI | L:D(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| Imidacloprid | 0.15 g/l | L:D(t) | 0.085 | — | (Vincent et al., 2000) |
| Imidacloprid | 0.005% AI | L:R(s) | Moderate | — | (Michaud et al., 2000) |
| Imidacloprid | 0.15 g/l | L:R(s) | Low | — | (Vincent et al., 2000) |
| Indoxacarb | 0.0616 kg(AI)/ha | F:(s) | Moderate | low | (Musser and Shelton, 2003) |
| Methomyl | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 148.26 | 34.95 | (Cho et al., 1997) |
| Methoxyfenozide | mg/l | L:O | — | 71.3 | (Carton et al., 2003) |
| Monocrotophos | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 208.64 | 366.7 | (Cho et al., 1997) |
| Parrafinic oil | 20 ml/l | L:DR(s) | — | Low | (Smith and Krischik, 2000) |
| Phospamidon | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 61.31 | 44.02 | (Cho et al., 1997) |
| Pymetrozine | 0.00022% AI | L:DR(s) | Low | — | (James, 2002) |
| Pyridaben | 0.038% AI | L:D(s) | Moderate | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Pyridaben | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | >25,000 | >25,000 | (Cho et al., 1996) |
| Pyridaben | 0.038% AI | L:R(s) | Low | — | (Michaud, 2002c) |
| Pyridaphenthion | ppm(AI) | L:D(t) | 186.7 | 341.65 | (Cho et al., 1997) |
| Pyriproxyfen | 0.0013% AI | L:D(s) | Low | Low | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| Pyriproxyfen | 0.0013% AI | L:R(s) | Low | Low | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| Soap, potassium salts, and fatty acids | 20 ml/l | L:DR(s) | — | Low | (Smith and Krischik, 2000) |
| Spinosad | 0.0790 kg(AI)/ha | F:(s) | Moderate | Modreate | (Musser and Shelton, 2003) |
| Spinosad | 0.05% AI | L:D(s) | Low | Low | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| Spinosad | 0.05% AI | L:R(s) | Low | Low | (Michaud, 2002d) |
| λ-cyhalothrin | 0.0262 kg(AI)/ha | F:(s) | High | High | (Musser and Shelton, 2003) |
1 Methods: Upper case letters to the left of the colon indicate whether it was a laboratory study (L) or field study (F).
Upper case letters to the right of the colon indicate whether the pesticide was applied directly to the insect (D), the insect was exposed to residue (R), or the insect was exposed orally through consumption of treated food (O).
Lower case letters in parentheses indicate whether the pesticide was applied as a spray (s), as a topical application of drops (t), or as a dip (d).
2 Relative acute susceptibility ratings: Low = 0-33% mortality, Moderate=34-66% mortality, High = 67-100% mortality