FiguresFull Size Figure 1. Mechanical modifications on the Bio Rad... Full Size Figure 2. LacZ gene expression in embryonic tissues... Full Size Figure 3. LacZ gene expression in a soft organ... TablesFull Size Table 1. Biolistic results... Full Size Table 2. Comparison of the Bio Rad device... Full Size Table 3. Comparison between aqueous and ethanol... |
![]() |
A helium burst biolistic device adapted to penetrate fragile insect tissues.Jean-Luc Thomas, Jérôme Bardou, Sebastien L'hoste1, Bernard Mauchamp and Gérard ChavancyUnité Nationale Séricicole, INRA, 25 Quai J.J. Rousseau, 69350 La mulatière, France.1Present address: INSERM U-528, pavillon Trouillet-Rossignol, Institut Curie, section de recherche, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris cedex 05 thomas@cismsun.univ-lyon1.fr Received 19 June 2001 Accepted 24 August 2001 Published October 04 2001 Cite this paper as: Thomas JL, Bardou J, L'hoste S, Mauchamp B, Chavancy G. 2001. A helium burst biolistic device adapted to penetrate fragile insect tissues. 10 pp. Journal of Insect Science, 1.9. Available online: insectscience.org/1.9 KeywordsBiolistics, gene gun, Bombyx mori, insect, transfection, gene expressionABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgements ReferencesTo compensate for the extremely low penetration efficiency of the original PDS/1000-He Bio Rad biolisticreg; device and the deleterious blast effect, design modifications have been made to the launching module. These modifications were evaluated on Bombyx mori embryos and fragile tissues, such as oocytes and imaginal wing disks. The original floppy macrocarrier was replaced by a rigid macrocarrier to avoid the effects of the helium blast. The efficiency of the gene gun bombardment was reinforced by the addition of a focusing nozzle. The reduced blast effect allowed us to carry out high-pressure shootings to small organs with improved penetration. This system allowed potentially all the internal embryonic tissues to be transfected with optimal survival rates. The new module was effective on tissues that are difficult to transfect, such as the epithelial wing disk that is covered by a peripodial membrane, and the ovarian follicle cells that lie under the ovariole cell membrane. The new macrocarrier allowed both an aqueous delivery of particles and an ethanolic dry delivery. No significant differences were noted between these two modes of delivery. The major improvement is the possibility of high pressure shooting correlated with appreciable penetration and a weak blast effect. INTRODUCTION Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgements References
MATERIALS AND METHODS Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Acknowledgements References
Preparation of embryos for gene gun bombarment experiments
Preparation of ovarioles for biolistics
Preparation of imaginal wing disks for biolistics
DNA vectors
Xgal staining
Preparation of DNA-coated particles
RESULTS Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Discussion Acknowledgements ReferencesNew design of the shooting module
Role of a rigid macrocarrier and a focusing nozzle
Comparisons of the Bio Rad shooting module and the modified device for wet shot particle suspension
Comparison between wet and ethanol-dried DNA particle preparations
Application to fragile tissues
DISCUSSION Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Acknowledgements References
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References
REFERENCES Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion AcknowledgementsBaldarelli RM, Lengyel JA. 1990. Transient expression of DNA after ballistic introduction into Drosophila embryos. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 5903. |
![]() |
|
||